What is the app for? (Goal)
- Improve operational efficiency
- Reduce input errors
- Move away from paper and Excel
- Visualize field operations
FiniteField
In Mac app outsourcing, early requirement alignment has a major impact on both cost and schedule.
At Finite Field, in a free 30-minute consultation, we organize your requirements and present rough cost and the practical execution path on the spot.
A rough cost range
The shortest route (Mac-only / 5-surface Flutter / phased strategy)
Which plan fits best (Light / Standard / Business)
Even if many details are unclear, estimates and execution become concrete once these three are defined.
After kickoff, requirement shifts are common: admin should be web-based, field teams need smartphones, or sales teams need Windows support.
With per-OS development, add-on cost grows quickly. With Flutter, shared architecture and implementation make one-pass specification changes easier.
| Comparison | Mac-only (separate implementation) | 5-surface (Flutter) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of specification changes | Adjustments often needed per OS | Changes are easier to converge in a single shared flow |
| Future expansion cost | Adding Web / Windows / mobile often increases reimplementation | Easier to plan expansion from day one and reduce double investment |
If unsure, a fast route is often: validate with Web first, then expand to Mac / Windows / mobile after proving value.
The more of these items you can share, the faster and more accurate the estimate becomes.
You can still proceed with blanks.
User volume (internal headcount / external users)
Authentication (Google / Microsoft / email / SSO)
Data requirements (sync / offline / permissions / audit)
Integrations (CSV / Excel / existing DB / external API / Slack, etc.)
Distribution method (App Store / internal distribution)
Current operations (Excel-based / existing system / replacement)
Timeline (what should run by when)
Future rollout plans (Windows / Web / iOS / Android)
Even when an offer looks inexpensive, these three points often inflate costs during operations.
Change requests become expensive and delivery can stall.
Each improvement round tends to become costly.
This often leads to double investment.
At Finite Field, subscription DaaS is designed around build → use → improve → scale.
This allows a practical delivery model that assumes ongoing specification change.
Align goals, users, devices, and timeline
Define minimum success criteria (MVP)
Move forward with weekly/biweekly deliverable reviews
Continuously improve based on field feedback
This request page shows pricing at a glance. See the pricing page for details.
JPY 298,000 / month
Web-only, maintenance, and minor improvements
JPY 598,000 / month
Web + app for new development and growth
From JPY 980,000 / month
Two lines and high-speed execution across multiple themes
Paste the following directly into the form and send it as-is (blanks are fine).
Copy-paste template
You can paste this into the form and send as-is.
Yes. Most projects start from a vague stage. If we know the goal, users, and devices, we can organize from the minimum success criteria (MVP).
Mac-only can be optimal in some cases. But if Web, smartphone, or Windows support is likely later, an integrated Flutter approach often reduces total cost.
The monthly DaaS model makes adjustments straightforward. You can change plans at any time.
Cloud usage fees for services such as Cloud Run and Firestore are billed at actual cost. We provide rough estimates during planning.
One consultation is enough to clarify your next best step.