Cost reduction template

Compare the true delivered cost of every route

The workbook compares volumetric weight with actual weight and includes factory price, domestic freight, export paperwork, international freight, tariff, destination clearance, and delivery fees.

chargeable weight full cost route comparison best option

If you need team collaboration, mobile data entry, photo uploads, corrective action reminders, or dashboards, view the systemized version.

Billing
Greater value

Actual or volumetric

Costs
7 lines

Full cost

Compare
Multi-route

One view

Recommend
Lowest cost

Bold highlight

Input example

Route comparison input example

Route, chargeable weight, and total landed cost are visible in one row.

Route Chicago to Dallas
Owner Emily Carter
Chargeable weight 1,280 kg
Total cost $84,600
Best option Rail plus truck

Free download

Put hidden route costs into one comparison

Compare ocean, air, rail, and truck routes on the same landed-cost basis.

File

Landed Cost and Freight Route Comparison Template.xlsx

File name: supply_chain_landed_cost_freight_comparison_template_en.xlsx

Sheets
5
Use case
Landed cost modeling and freight route comparison
Chargeable weight uses the greater of actual and volumetric weight.
Seven major cost lines are included.
The lowest-cost route appears in the best option box.
Download free Excel template

Enter each route and cost line; the lowest-cost route is highlighted in bold.

Workflow

Landed cost comparison flow

Enter weight and volume, fill all cost lines, then compare total cost by route.

1

Enter weight and volume

Calculate actual and volumetric weight together so freight is not underestimated.

2

Fill total cost lines

Combine factory price, freight, paperwork, tariff, clearance, and delivery fees.

3

Compare routes

Convert every freight option to the same landed-cost basis.

4

Choose the best option

The lowest total cost route is bolded for quick decisions.

System mapping

How the workbook can become a system

Use the workbook to align inputs first, then systemize the alerts, approvals, and cross-team sync that repeat often.

Workbook field System module Reason to move
Workbook field
Weight and volume
System module
Freight rate rules
Reason to move
Standardize chargeable weight.
Workbook field
Cost lines
System module
Costing center
Reason to move
Avoid judging routes by freight alone.
Workbook field
Best route
System module
Logistics decision flow
Reason to move
Move the comparison into execution.

Adoption boundary

Where spreadsheets are enough and where systems help

Supply-chain workbooks are good for aligning decision logic. When data sources, permissions, and reminders grow, move the repeated parts into a system.

Spreadsheet fit

One team aligning quickly

When data volume is small and the rule is still being tested, a workbook is the fastest shared layer.

  • Single team
  • Manual review
  • Short pilot
Partial systemization

More alerts and approvals

When the same result needs routing or approval, systemize the key checkpoints first.

  • Automatic alerts
  • Approval flow
  • Owner tracking
Full systemization

Cross-warehouse coordination

When data sources, permissions, and update frequency grow, move data and workflow into a shared system.

  • Multiple sources
  • Access control
  • Process history

FAQ

Supply-chain template FAQ

Review the inputs and operating boundary before downloading.

Why compare volumetric and actual weight?

Freight billing often uses the greater value, so actual weight alone can understate cost.

Can tariff rates be changed?

Yes. Tariff is an input so it can vary by product or destination.

Does the best option consider speed?

The default recommendation is lowest cost. Add transit time notes when service level matters.

Download Excel Template View Systemized Version Discuss a Custom Solution