What is the typical ?? range ? Mac ? ???
It depends on features, distribution model, ? quality requirements. ?? Finite Field's DaaS, the benchmarks are ??? (JPY 298,000/month) ? minor updates ? Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? new builds ? growth.
FiniteField
? Mac ? ??, building ?? ? Mac is often less effective than building Mac, ???, ?, iOS, ? ????? together ?? Flutter. ?? the same budget, you can usually reach a wider user base.
At Finite Field, we combine subscription-based DaaS (?? as a Service) ?? Flutter ? provide a delivery setup that keeps product ?? moving, starting at zero upfront ?? ? JPY 298,000/month.
Pricing model: ongoing ?? improvement instead ? one-time upfront delivery (pauseable ? scalable)
Flutter advantage: develop Mac / ??? / ? / iOS / ????? together (one spec change cycle)
?? path: Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? fastest progress ?? launch ? growth
What is the typical ?? range ? Mac ? ???
It depends on features, distribution model, ? quality requirements. ?? Finite Field's DaaS, the benchmarks are ??? (JPY 298,000/month) ? minor updates ? Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? new builds ? growth.
If we ?? ?? Mac now, why choose Flutter?
You reduce rework risk when ?, mobile, ?? ??? becomes necessary later. Spec changes are also easier ? reflect ?? one cycle.
Can you ?? internal distribution instead ? ? Store release?
Yes. We propose the right process based on your distribution method, including internal distribution ? MDM.
Mac ? costs mainly vary by the following factors.
Use case: internal tool / business system / consumer ?
Distribution: ? Store / internal package (DMG) / MDM
Features: authentication, sync, offline, notifications, permissions, printing, integrations
Quality scope: ???, auditability, security, operations monitoring
Future scope: Mac ?? vs planned multi-OS rollout
?? Mac ? projects, requirements frequently expand during delivery.
If each OS is implemented separately, spec changes ? additional work fragment across teams, slowing decisions ? increasing maintenance costs. Flutter usually allows one design direction ? one implementation strategy across platforms.
The field team also needs a ? ??
People need access ?? iPhone/iPad while outside
Sales teams are on ???
Browser access is needed ? partner sharing
| Requirements | Requirements x 5 | Requirements x 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | Implementation x 5 | Implementation x 1 (high sharing) |
| Testing | ??? x 5 | Shared test assets |
| Comparison | Traditional outsourcing (per OS) | Finite Field DaaS (Flutter) |
|---|---|---|
| Supported OS | Mac ?? (other OS require separate budget) | Mac / ??? / ? / iOS / ????? together |
| Upfront ?? | Often JPY millions ? tens ? millions | JPY 0 upfront (?? ??) |
| Delivery speed | Parallel but separate OS tracks | One line progressing across all OS |
| Spec changes | Re-coordination per OS | Changes reflected ?? one cycle |
| Maintenance | Often separate quotation each time | Continuous ?? ?? ?? ?? (depends on tier) |
| Risk profile | Value appears ?? near handover | You can pause ?? scale as needed |
Three plans designed ? starting small ?? Mac ? scaling ? five platforms when needed.
JPY 298,000/month
Maintenance phase / small internal tool updates
Good fit
Minor improvements ? existing tools, small internal feature additions, ? continuous operational tuning
JPY 598,000/month
New product ? growth phase / full build momentum
Good fit
Start ?? Mac ? expand ? ?/mobile/??? while growing the business ? incrementally
Most suitable ? users arriving via Mac ?? search intent
?? JPY 980,000/month
Large scale / high-speed execution ?? parallel tracks
Good fit
Parallel new feature delivery ? operations, multi-department rollout, ? short-term replacement at scale
New ?? inevitably comes ?? early spec changes.
Standard combines ? + ? scope ?? biweekly prioritization cycles, which usually shortens the loop ?? planning ? adoption.
If these points are clear, rough estimates become much faster.
Unknown items are completely fine at consultation stage.
User volume (internal headcount / external users)
Authentication (Google/Microsoft/ID-password/SSO)
Data model (sync/offline/permissions/audit)
Integrations (CSV/Excel/existing DB/API/Slack, etc.)
Distribution (? Store / internal deployment)
Future expansion ? ??? / ? / iOS / ?????
Three common failure patterns ?? Mac ? ??:
?? DaaS, you can operate ?? a continuous loop ? build, use, improve, ? scale. This typically stabilizes total ?? better than relying on the first quotation alone.
?? depends on features, distribution model, ? quality requirements. ?? Finite Field DaaS, the benchmarks are ??? (JPY 298,000/month) ? minor updates ? Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? new ?? ? growth.
It minimizes double investment risk when ?, mobile, ?? ??? becomes necessary later. Spec changes are also easier ? manage ?? one shared flow.
Yes. We propose the right rollout strategy based on internal distribution ?? MDM requirements.
Yes. Because DaaS is ??, moving ??? ? Standard ? Business, ?? pausing at a milestone, is easier ? design contractually.
Cloud costs (? ?? Cloud Run ?? Firestore) are billed at actual ???. We provide rough estimates during solution design.
?? one 30-minute session, we can compare Mac-?? vs 5-platform scope ? clarify which path gives better return.