Mac ? ?? ?? / ?? / estimate / outsourcing

Mac ? ?? ??: Flutter? Mac + ??? / ? / iOS / ????? ?? ??

? Mac ? ??, building ?? ? Mac is often less effective than building Mac, ???, ?, iOS, ? ????? together ?? Flutter. ?? the same budget, you can usually reach a wider user base.

At Finite Field, we combine subscription-based DaaS (?? as a Service) ?? Flutter ? provide a delivery setup that keeps product ?? moving, starting at zero upfront ?? ? JPY 298,000/month.

Key points ?? 3 seconds

  • Pricing model: ongoing ?? improvement instead ? one-time upfront delivery (pauseable ? scalable)

  • Flutter advantage: develop Mac / ??? / ? / iOS / ????? together (one spec change cycle)

  • ?? path: Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? fastest progress ?? launch ? growth

FAQ ??

What is the typical ?? range ? Mac ? ???

It depends on features, distribution model, ? quality requirements. ?? Finite Field's DaaS, the benchmarks are ??? (JPY 298,000/month) ? minor updates ? Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? new builds ? growth.

If we ?? ?? Mac now, why choose Flutter?

You reduce rework risk when ?, mobile, ?? ??? becomes necessary later. Spec changes are also easier ? reflect ?? one cycle.

Can you ?? internal distribution instead ? ? Store release?

Yes. We propose the right process based on your distribution method, including internal distribution ? MDM.

Mac ? ?? depends on what you build ? how far you need ? go

Mac ? costs mainly vary by the following factors.

  • Use case: internal tool / business system / consumer ?

  • Distribution: ? Store / internal package (DMG) / MDM

  • Features: authentication, sync, offline, notifications, permissions, printing, integrations

  • Quality scope: ???, auditability, security, operations monitoring

  • Future scope: Mac ?? vs planned multi-OS rollout

If you lock into a Mac-?? architecture ?? the start, adding other OS targets later can easily lead ? double investment.

Why 5-platform Flutter ?? often outperforms Mac-?? ??

?? Mac ? projects, requirements frequently expand during delivery.

If each OS is implemented separately, spec changes ? additional work fragment across teams, slowing decisions ? increasing maintenance costs. Flutter usually allows one design direction ? one implementation strategy across platforms.

Common requirement shifts

  • The field team also needs a ? ??

  • People need access ?? iPhone/iPad while outside

  • Sales teams are on ???

  • Browser access is needed ? partner sharing

Spec change ?? pattern (concept)

Requirements Requirements x 5 Requirements x 1
Implementation Implementation x 5 Implementation x 1 (high sharing)
Testing ??? x 5 Shared test assets

Traditional outsourcing (per OS) vs Flutter x DaaS (Finite Field)

Comparison Traditional outsourcing (per OS) Finite Field DaaS (Flutter)
Supported OS Mac ?? (other OS require separate budget) Mac / ??? / ? / iOS / ????? together
Upfront ?? Often JPY millions ? tens ? millions JPY 0 upfront (?? ??)
Delivery speed Parallel but separate OS tracks One line progressing across all OS
Spec changes Re-coordination per OS Changes reflected ?? one cycle
Maintenance Often separate quotation each time Continuous ?? ?? ?? ?? (depends on tier)
Risk profile Value appears ?? near handover You can pause ?? scale as needed

Pricing plans (zero upfront, ??)

Three plans designed ? starting small ?? Mac ? scaling ? five platforms when needed.

Light

JPY 298,000/month

Maintenance phase / small internal tool updates

  • 1 ?? line
  • ? ??
  • Meetings as needed
  • Infrastructure ??: actuals

Good fit

Minor improvements ? existing tools, small internal feature additions, ? continuous operational tuning

?? / Fastest route

Standard

JPY 598,000/month

New product ? growth phase / full build momentum

  • 1 ?? line
  • ? + ?
  • Biweekly meetings
  • Infrastructure ??: actuals

Good fit

Start ?? Mac ? expand ? ?/mobile/??? while growing the business ? incrementally

Most suitable ? users arriving via Mac ?? search intent

Business

?? JPY 980,000/month

Large scale / high-speed execution ?? parallel tracks

  • 2 ?? lines (about 2x throughput)
  • ? + ?
  • Weekly meetings
  • Infrastructure ??: actuals

Good fit

Parallel new feature delivery ? operations, multi-department rollout, ? short-term replacement at scale

? Mac search traffic: why Standard is often the best fit

New ?? inevitably comes ?? early spec changes.

Standard combines ? + ? scope ?? biweekly prioritization cycles, which usually shortens the loop ?? planning ? adoption.

  • Keeps future ??? / ? / iOS / ????? rollout options open ?? day one
  • Matches iterative product improvement during operation
  • Makes ??-effectiveness validation cycles easier ? sustain

????? that drives Mac ? ?? ??

If these points are clear, rough estimates become much faster.

Unknown items are completely fine at consultation stage.

  • User volume (internal headcount / external users)

  • Authentication (Google/Microsoft/ID-password/SSO)

  • Data model (sync/offline/permissions/audit)

  • Integrations (CSV/Excel/existing DB/API/Slack, etc.)

  • Distribution (? Store / internal deployment)

  • Future expansion ? ??? / ? / iOS / ?????

Cheaper first build is not always cheaper ?? total

Three common failure patterns ?? Mac ? ??:

  • Issuing a fixed-scope contract before requirements are stable
  • Separating maintenance contracts, making each improvement expensive
  • Building Mac-?? first, then rebuilding ? other platforms later

?? DaaS, you can operate ?? a continuous loop ? build, use, improve, ? scale. This typically stabilizes total ?? better than relying on the first quotation alone.

Frequently asked questions

What is the typical ?? benchmark ? Mac ? ???

?? depends on features, distribution model, ? quality requirements. ?? Finite Field DaaS, the benchmarks are ??? (JPY 298,000/month) ? minor updates ? Standard (JPY 598,000/month) ? new ?? ? growth.

If we ?? need Mac now, why use Flutter?

It minimizes double investment risk when ?, mobile, ?? ??? becomes necessary later. Spec changes are also easier ? manage ?? one shared flow.

Can you ?? internal distribution instead ? ? Store release?

Yes. We propose the right rollout strategy based on internal distribution ?? MDM requirements.

Can we change plans ?? pause later?

Yes. Because DaaS is ??, moving ??? ? Standard ? Business, ?? pausing at a milestone, is easier ? design contractually.

What does infrastructure ?? as actuals mean?

Cloud costs (? ?? Cloud Run ?? Firestore) are billed at actual ???. We provide rough estimates during solution design.

Launch your Mac ? as a 5-platform product, faster

?? one 30-minute session, we can compare Mac-?? vs 5-platform scope ? clarify which path gives better return.

  • Free 30-minute online consultation
  • Requirements template + rough estimate + execution proposal
  • Joint evaluation: Mac-?? ?? 5-platform rollout